Linked Life Data

11747166

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/11747166

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
3
pubmed:dateCreated
2001-12-17
pubmed:abstractText
We tested whether fractional flow reserve (FFR) discriminates between suboptimally and optimally deployed stents. Latex tubes (diameter solidus in circle = 4 mm) with diameter stenosis 40% (n = 3), 50% (n = 3) and 60% (n = 3) were tested in a pulsatile flow system, using water. Measurements were done at baseline (n = 9; FFR/QCA) and after suboptimal (SOD; 3-mm balloon at 8 atm) and optimal (OD; 4 mm balloon at 16 atm) deployment of a 35-mm stent (n = 6; FFR/QCA/IVUS). Varying Q from 150 to 50 ml/min increased FFR by 2-7%. Conversely, at 100 ml/min, FFR increased by only 0.8% from SOD to OD (P < 0.05). Extrapolating data to blood flow, the gain in FFR from SOD to OD is less than 5% for Q = 100 ml/min, while FFR may increase by 15-20% by changes in blood flow from 50 to 150 ml/min. We conclude that IVUS and QCA are more appropriate for the assessment of optimal stent deployment.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Nov
pubmed:issn
1522-1946
pubmed:author
pubmed:copyrightInfo
Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
54
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
363-75
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2001
pubmed:articleTitle
In vitro study of FFR, QCA, and IVUS for the assessment of optimal stent deployment.
pubmed:affiliation
Institute Biomedical Technology IBITECH, Hydraulics Laboratory, Ghent University, Belgium. koen.matthys@rug.ac.be
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't