Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
2001-11-30
pubmed:abstractText
Clinically effective cancer immunotherapy has been sought for more than 100 years and has been recently applied most successfully in strategies that passively deliver immune effectors such as monoclonal antibodies (anti-CD20 for lymphoma and anti-HER2/neu for breast cancer), donor lymphocyte infusions in chronic myelongenous leukemia and non-myeloablative allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor transplants for renal cell carcinoma. There is mounting enthusiasm for strategies employing active stimulation of antitumour immune responses. These include vaccines based on tumour antigen proteins and peptides, autologous, allogeneic or gene-modified tumour cells, dendritic cells and antigen-encoding viral vector constructs. Indeed, randomised Phase III clinical trials of autologous tumour cell vaccines for colorectal cancer demonstrated an improvement in disease free survival and a trend toward improved overall survival [1]. Despite these preliminary successes, it is clear that the many strategies under development cannot all be evaluated for survival benefit in large clinical trials that require many years, patients and resources to complete. This highlights the need to develop intermediate markers to help prioritise which agents to test in prospective randomised Phase III trials.
pubmed:grant
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Mar
pubmed:issn
1471-2598
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
1
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
153-8
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2001
pubmed:articleTitle
Surrogate markers of response to cancer immunotherapy.
pubmed:publicationType
Editorial, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S., Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't