Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
4
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
1975-6-13
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
The authors compared the results of independent evaluations of 96 patients, each of whom was given a traditional psychiatric interview, resulting in a narrative report, and a structured interview based on a self-report questionnaire, resulting in a standardized report. Although the latter method produced a higher frequency of report of all symptoms, the overall accuracy of diagnoses was similar for the two methods. The authors enumerate the potential benefits of the use of standardized histories.
|
| pubmed:language |
eng
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
AIM
|
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:month |
Apr
|
| pubmed:issn |
0002-953X
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:volume |
132
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
450-3
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2007-11-15
|
| pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:1168027-Colombia,
pubmed-meshheading:1168027-Evaluation Studies as Topic,
pubmed-meshheading:1168027-Hospitals, Psychiatric,
pubmed-meshheading:1168027-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:1168027-Interview, Psychological,
pubmed-meshheading:1168027-Mental Disorders,
pubmed-meshheading:1168027-Psychiatric Status Rating Scales,
pubmed-meshheading:1168027-Questionnaires
|
| pubmed:year |
1975
|
| pubmed:articleTitle |
A comparison of traditional and symptom-checklist-based histories.
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|