Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
10
pubmed:dateCreated
2001-10-26
pubmed:abstractText
Many patient-based knee-rating scales are available for the evaluation of athletic patients. However, there is little information on the measurement properties of these instruments and therefore no evidence to support the use of one questionnaire rather than another. The goal of the present study was to determine the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of four knee-rating scales commonly used for the evaluation of athletic patients: the Lysholm scale, the subjective components of the Cincinnati knee-rating system, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons sports knee-rating scale, and the Activities of Daily Living scale of the Knee Outcome Survey.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Oct
pubmed:issn
0021-9355
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
83-A
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
1459-69
pubmed:dateRevised
2010-10-25
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2001
pubmed:articleTitle
Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of four knee outcome scales for athletic patients.
pubmed:affiliation
Center for Clinical Outcome Research, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY 10021, USA. marxr@hss.edu
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Validation Studies