Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
3 Suppl
pubmed:dateCreated
1995-10-12
pubmed:abstractText
Setting priorities about medical services, including genetic testing services, often occurs in an extemporaneous fashion. Normative assumptions may not be examined critically, although doing so is a necessary component of making health policy decisions about clinical practice. The normative dimension to health policy questions suggests a need for greater public participation in the development of clinical practice guidelines. The experiences of newborn screening and carrier screening for cystic fibrosis in the United States can be examined within the framework of two models of health policy development that help explain the role in health policy development of normative assumptions and public participation. Specifically, this paper focuses on assumptions about what counts as sufficient empirical data to make health policy decisions.
pubmed:keyword
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
E
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0093-0334
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
25
pubmed:owner
KIE
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
S21-3
pubmed:dateRevised
2009-11-19
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed-meshheading:11654188-Conflict of Interest, pubmed-meshheading:11654188-Consumer Participation, pubmed-meshheading:11654188-Cystic Fibrosis, pubmed-meshheading:11654188-Decision Making, pubmed-meshheading:11654188-Evaluation Studies as Topic, pubmed-meshheading:11654188-Financial Support, pubmed-meshheading:11654188-Genetic Counseling, pubmed-meshheading:11654188-Genetic Services, pubmed-meshheading:11654188-Genetic Testing, pubmed-meshheading:11654188-Heterozygote, pubmed-meshheading:11654188-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:11654188-Industry, pubmed-meshheading:11654188-Infant, Newborn, pubmed-meshheading:11654188-Mass Screening, pubmed-meshheading:11654188-National Institutes of Health (U.S.), pubmed-meshheading:11654188-Organizational Policy, pubmed-meshheading:11654188-Patient Advocacy, pubmed-meshheading:11654188-Policy Making, pubmed-meshheading:11654188-Politics, pubmed-meshheading:11654188-Prejudice, pubmed-meshheading:11654188-Prognosis, pubmed-meshheading:11654188-Public Policy, pubmed-meshheading:11654188-Reference Standards, pubmed-meshheading:11654188-Reproductive Techniques, Assisted, pubmed-meshheading:11654188-Risk, pubmed-meshheading:11654188-Risk Assessment, pubmed-meshheading:11654188-Social Justice, pubmed-meshheading:11654188-Societies, pubmed-meshheading:11654188-Treatment Outcome, pubmed-meshheading:11654188-United States
pubmed:articleTitle
Screening policy for cystic fibrosis: the role of evidence.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article