Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:1161995rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1161995lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0009170lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1161995lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0025810lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1161995lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0036516lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1161995lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0597198lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1161995lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1161995lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1314677lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1161995pubmed:issue1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1161995pubmed:dateCreated1975-12-4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1161995pubmed:abstractTextCocaine, methylphenidate and secobarbital were compared on a drug maintained progressive-ratio procedure in baboon subjects. Trials, scheduled throughout the day, occurred at a minimum interval of 3 hrs after completion of the preceding trial. A ratio response requirement on the "initiate" lever was required during each trial which terminated in a single intravenous infusion of drug. A drug was introduced on the progressive-ratio procedure with a low ratio requirement in order to obtain a baseline performance of a high stable frequency of trial completion. The ratio requirement was systematically increased every 7 days until the "breaking point" when the rate of completing trials fell below a criterion level. Within-subject comparison revealed that cocaine produced higher breaking points than methylphenidate at the same absolute dose, 0.4 mg/kg. At the range of doses studied, manipulation of doses of methylphenidate (0.1-0.8 mg/kg) and cocaine (0.4-1.6 mg/kg) had little effect on breaking point. In contrast, increasing doses of secobarbital (6.0 and 12.0 mg/kg) produce higher breaking points within the same subjects.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1161995pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1161995pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1161995pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1161995pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1161995pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1161995pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1161995pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1161995pubmed:monthJullld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1161995pubmed:issn0033-3158lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1161995pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BradyJ VJVlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1161995pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GriffithsR...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1161995pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FindleyJ DJDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1161995pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RobinsonW WWWlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1161995pubmed:authorpubmed-author:Dolan-Gutcher...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1161995pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1161995pubmed:day23lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1161995pubmed:volume43lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1161995pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1161995pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1161995pubmed:pagination81-3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1161995pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1161995pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1161995-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1161995pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1161995-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1161995pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1161995-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1161995pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1161995-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1161995pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1161995-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1161995pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1161995-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1161995pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1161995-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1161995pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1161995-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1161995pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1161995-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1161995pubmed:year1975lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1161995pubmed:articleTitleComparison of progressive-ratio performance maintained by cocaine, methylphenidate and secobarbital.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1161995pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1161995pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1161995pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1161995lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1161995lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1161995lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1161995lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1161995lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1161995lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1161995lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1161995lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1161995lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1161995lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1161995lld:pubmed