Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
4
pubmed:dateCreated
2001-9-14
pubmed:abstractText
Little is known about acetylcholine (ACh) modulation of central visual processing in humans. Receptor densities in visual brain regions are differentially distributed suggesting that receptor subtypes have different functions. Using PET, we have previously described the brain regions activated by a simple pattern-flash stimulus in healthy elderly subjects. To evaluate muscarinic and nicotinic contributions to ACh modulation of visual processing, we scanned elderly subjects watching the pattern-flash stimulus during no drug, during physostigmine augmentation, and during scopolamine antagonism of physostigmine's action. These manipulations of ACh significantly altered regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in brain regions activated by the task. The pattern of rCBF values across drug conditions suggested that muscarinic and nicotinic effects were dissociated. Muscarinic action predominated in striate cortex (Brodmann Area, BA 17) and lateral visual association areas (BA 18, 19), while nicotinic action predominated in the thalamus and inferior parietal regions (BA 39/40). Both muscarinic and nicotinic actions increased rCBF in some regions while decreasing it in others. A parsimonious reconciliation of these results with functional anatomy suggests that muscarinic action modulates visual attribute processing, while nicotinic action modulates arousal and selective attention to the visual task.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Oct
pubmed:issn
0893-133X
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
25
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
555-64
pubmed:dateRevised
2011-11-17
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed-meshheading:11557169-Aged, pubmed-meshheading:11557169-Attention, pubmed-meshheading:11557169-Brain Chemistry, pubmed-meshheading:11557169-Cerebrovascular Circulation, pubmed-meshheading:11557169-Cholinesterase Inhibitors, pubmed-meshheading:11557169-Double-Blind Method, pubmed-meshheading:11557169-Female, pubmed-meshheading:11557169-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:11557169-Male, pubmed-meshheading:11557169-Middle Aged, pubmed-meshheading:11557169-Muscarinic Antagonists, pubmed-meshheading:11557169-Neuropsychological Tests, pubmed-meshheading:11557169-Photic Stimulation, pubmed-meshheading:11557169-Physostigmine, pubmed-meshheading:11557169-Receptors, Muscarinic, pubmed-meshheading:11557169-Receptors, Nicotinic, pubmed-meshheading:11557169-Scopolamine Hydrobromide, pubmed-meshheading:11557169-Tomography, Emission-Computed, pubmed-meshheading:11557169-Visual Perception
pubmed:year
2001
pubmed:articleTitle
Muscarinic versus nicotinic modulation of a visual task. a pet study using drug probes.
pubmed:affiliation
Laboratory of Neurosciences, NIA/NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA. marcjm@optonline.net
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Randomized Controlled Trial