Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/11553504
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
9
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2001-9-12
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Scientific journals rely on peer review to maintain the high quality and standards of papers accepted for publication. The purpose of this study was to explore the strengths and weaknesses of medical education reports by analyzing the ratings and written comments given by external reviewers.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
AIM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Sep
|
pubmed:issn |
1040-2446
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
76
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
889-96
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2004-11-17
|
pubmed:meshHeading | |
pubmed:year |
2001
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Reasons reviewers reject and accept manuscripts: the strengths and weaknesses in medical education reports.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Medical Education, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, IL 60612-7309, USA. bordage@uic.edu
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|