Linked Life Data

11516714

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/11516714

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1-2
pubmed:dateCreated
2001-8-22
pubmed:abstractText
One of the important advantages of the comet assay is its ability to detect genotoxicity in many different organs. Since the exposure route of the test compounds is likely to influence the genotoxicity detected in a given organ, it is an important factor to consider when conducting the assay. In this study, we compared the effects of numerous model compounds on eight organs when administered to mice by intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection and oral (p.o.) gavage. Groups of four mice were treated once i.p. or p.o. at the identical proportion of LD50 for each route, and the stomach, colon, liver, kidney, bladder, lung, brain, and bone marrow were sampled 3, 8, and 24h after treatment. For 19 of the 20 tested mutagens with various modes of action, genotoxicity in some organs varied with treatment route; only the genotoxicity of methyl methane sulfonate was not affected. Treatment route, however, did not produce a qualitative difference in the genotoxicity of promutagens at the sites of conversion to ultimate mutagens, with aromatic hydrocarbons as the exception. When chemicals with positive responses in at least one organ were considered to be comet assay-positive, the administration route made no difference. Since azo reduction is mediated by azo reductase synthesized in the gastrointestinal wall and by gut microflora and i.p.-administered azo dyes bypass their activation site (colon), the administration route is expected to make a difference in their in vivo genotoxicity. Direct-acting mutagens are expected to affect the mucosa of the gastrointestinal tract when given p.o. For those mutagens, however, the administration route did not make a qualitative difference in gastrointestinal tract genotoxicity. Moreover, although the gastrointestinal mucosa is the first site to be exposed to p.o. administered agents, the peak times in the stomach tended to be the same as in most other organs. Based on those results, we concluded that the genotoxicity at high exposures was due to a systemic effect, and that both routes are acceptable for the comet assay when the liver and gastrointestinal organs are sampled, so long as appropriate dose levels for systemic exposure are selected for each route.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jun
pubmed:issn
0027-5107
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:day
27
pubmed:volume
493
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
39-54
pubmed:dateRevised
2009-11-3
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2001
pubmed:articleTitle
A comparison of intraperitoneal and oral gavage administration in comet assay in mouse eight organs.
pubmed:affiliation
Laboratory of Genotoxicity, Faculty of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Hachinohe National College of Technology, Tamonoki Uwanotai 16-1, Hachinohe, Aomori 039-1192, Japan.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study