Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/11471394
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
1-2
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2001-7-26
|
pubmed:abstractText |
In an earlier study using the visually guided pointing task (VGPT) the authors showed that the timing of imagined movement sequences in children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD) does not conform to the conventional speed-for-accuracy trade-off (or Fitts' law [P.M. Fitts, Journal of Experimental Psychology 47 (1954) 381-391]) that occurs when the distance and accuracy requirements of movements are varied [P. Maruff, P.H. Wilson, M. Trebilcock, J. Currie, Neuropsychologia 37 (1999b) 1317-1324]. The present study sought to replicate this earlier finding and to examine (using a weight manipulation) whether this deficit was also attributable to inaccurate programming of relative force. The chronometry of real and imagined movements was investigated in a group of 20 children with DCD aged between 8 and 12 years and a group of controls matched on age and verbal IQ (VIQ). Movement duration was tested for real and imagined movements using the preferred hand, with the VGPT performed under two load conditions: with and without the addition of a weight attached to a pen. Group means of each subjects' mean movement duration were calculated and plotted against target width for each of the four conditions [Movement type (2) x Load (2)] and a logarithmic curve was fitted to the data points. In the control group, the speed-for-accuracy trade-off for both real and imagined performance conformed to Fitts' law under each load condition. In the DCD group only real movements conformed to Fitts' law. Moreover, the effect of load differed between groups--for real movements, movement duration did not differ between load and no-load conditions for either group, while for imagined movements, movement duration increased under the load condition for the control group only. These results replicate and extend the results of our earlier study. This pattern of performance suggests that children with DCD have an impairment in the ability to generate internal representations of volitional movements which may reflect an impaired ability to process efference copy signals. The ability to programme both relative force and timing appears to underly this difficulty. Results have implications for the use of (guided) motor imagery training in order to facilitate the development of motor skill in children with DCD.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Mar
|
pubmed:issn |
0167-9457
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
20
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
135-59
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2004-11-17
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:11471394-Child,
pubmed-meshheading:11471394-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:11471394-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:11471394-Imagination,
pubmed-meshheading:11471394-Individuality,
pubmed-meshheading:11471394-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:11471394-Motor Activity,
pubmed-meshheading:11471394-Motor Skills Disorders,
pubmed-meshheading:11471394-Movement,
pubmed-meshheading:11471394-Reference Values
|
pubmed:year |
2001
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Abnormalities of motor and praxis imagery in children with DCD.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Psychology and Disability Studies, RMIT University, P.O. Box 2476V, Melbourne, Vic. 3001, Australia. peter.h.wilson@rmit.edu.au
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|