Linked Life Data

11470622

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/11470622

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2-3
pubmed:dateCreated
2001-7-25
pubmed:abstractText
Both keyboard-based and pen-based devices for data input have advantages and disadvantages. The suitability of the two input devices for entering different types of clinical data into computers remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the usefulness of different types of technology for nurses' data entry by comparing the utility and efficiency of keyboard and pen-based data input for clinical tasks. The study was conducted in the six largest specialties of an acute care hospital. In each specialty, several wards were randomly selected, and all nurses working in these wards were invited to participate. The input prototype was designed according to the type of text that was to be entered into the system. Task 1 mainly consisted of structured data, Task 2 contained equal amount of structured and textual data, and Task 3 was mainly in textual form. Each nurse was asked to complete the three simulations of nursing records (Tasks 1, 2 and 3). Preliminary findings showed that nurses found the pen-based interface easier to use than the keyboard for completing Tasks 1 and 2, but not Task 3. In terms of accuracy, the nurses preferred the keyboard to the pen when the data were more structured. The pen-based device is not a panacea for all kinds of user interface, and more importantly, the choice of input device should depend on the amount of structured and textual data.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jul
pubmed:issn
1386-5056
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
62
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
189-93
pubmed:dateRevised
2009-11-3
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2001
pubmed:articleTitle
An evaluation of the use of hand-held computers for bedside nursing care.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Community Medicine and Unit for Behavioural Sciences, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Randomized Controlled Trial, Evaluation Studies