Linked Life Data

11460285

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/11460285

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
2001-7-19
pubmed:abstractText
Interproximal access efficacy (IAE) has been evaluated in a laboratory method using pressure-sensitive paper placed around simulated anterior and posterior teeth, using horizontal or vertical brushing motions. The two toothbrushes evaluated in this study were the Oral-B Cross Action Medium 40 and the Dr. Best X-Activ Mittel. Twenty-four tests on each toothbrush design were conducted, and results were statistically analyzed using ANOVA. In all of the individual evaluations, using either vertical or horizontal brushing motions on either anterior or posterior simulated teeth, the Dr. Best X-Activ Mittel toothbrush was significantly (p < 0.001) more effective than the Oral-B Cross Action Medium 40 in achieving IAE. When individual IAE data from the vertical, horizontal, anterior and posterior assessments were combined to assess overall IAE, the Dr. Best X-Activ Mittel toothbrush had a significantly (p < 0.001) higher mean value than the Oral-B Cross Action Medium 40 mean value.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
D
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0895-8831
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
11
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
60-2
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2000
pubmed:articleTitle
Laboratory interproximal access efficacy of two toothbrushes with cross-angulated bristling.
pubmed:affiliation
University of Pennsylvania School of Dental Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA. YRCINC@aol.com
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study