11442127

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/11442127

Download in:

Switch to

Custom View

Named Graph Language Inference

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
Predicate	Object
rdf:type	pubmed:Citation
lifeskim:mentions	umls-concept:C0003737, umls-concept:C0182281, umls-concept:C0243095, umls-concept:C1707455, umls-concept:C1707689, umls-concept:C2698651
pubmed:issue	2 Suppl 1
pubmed:dateCreated	2001-7-9
pubmed:abstractText	At present, there are two basic picture archiving and communication system (PACS) architectures: centralized with a central cache and controller, and distributed with a distributed cache and central controller. A third architecture proposed here is an autonomous one with a distributed cache and no controller. This report will investigate the performance (as measured be central processing unit [CPU] and network load, scalability, and examination retrieval and display latency) of these three types.
pubmed:language	eng
pubmed:journal	http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/journal/9100529
pubmed:citationSubset	IM
pubmed:status	MEDLINE
pubmed:month	Jun
pubmed:issn	0897-1889
pubmed:author	pubmed-author:AndrioleK PKP, pubmed-author:TellisW MWM
pubmed:issnType	Print
pubmed:volume	14
pubmed:owner	NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete	Y
pubmed:pagination	72-6
pubmed:dateRevised	2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading	pubmed-meshheading:11442127-Computer Communication Networks, pubmed-meshheading:11442127-Computer Peripherals, pubmed-meshheading:11442127-Computer Systems, pubmed-meshheading:11442127-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:11442127-Radiology Information Systems
pubmed:year	2001
pubmed:articleTitle	Finding the optimal picture archiving and communication system (PACS) architecture: a comparison of three PACS designs.
pubmed:affiliation	Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, 94143-0628, USA. wyatt.tellis@radiology.ucsf.edu
pubmed:publicationType	Journal Article, Comparative Study