Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/11374047
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
2
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2001-5-25
|
pubmed:abstractText |
This study set out to compare adhesion reformation after conventional and laparoscopic adhesiolysis using two different laparoscopic dissection techniques. In a first operation, 36 rabbits underwent fixation of 6 cm2 of the cecum with the serosa removed to the lateral abdominal wall to induce standardized adhesions. After 4 weeks, adhesiolysis was performed laparoscopically (n = 12) or via laparotomy (n = 12) using sharp and blunt dissection. In a third group (n = 12), laparoscopic adhesiolysis was performed using monopolar electrocautery. Outcome was assessed by incidence, extent, and localization of adhesion reformation. After conventional adhesiolysis, all rabbits developed new adhesions relative to 79% after laparoscopic adhesiolysis. The extent of reformed adhesions (median) was greater after conventional adhesiolysis than laparoscopic adhesiolysis (2725 mm2 vs 230 mm2, P < 0.001). The latter did not differ significantly from laparoscopic adhesiolysis by electrocautery (310 mm2). There were small adhesions to 3 of 72 trocar wounds, but extensive adhesions to 33% of the abdominal incisions were found in the conventional group. In this standardized experimental setting, laparoscopic adhesiolysis is associated with a significantly reduced reformation of adhesions. Different laparoscopic dissection techniques have no significant influence on the extent of adhesion reformation.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Mar
|
pubmed:issn |
1435-2443
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
386
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
141-5
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2008-11-21
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:11374047-Abdomen,
pubmed-meshheading:11374047-Animals,
pubmed-meshheading:11374047-Electrocoagulation,
pubmed-meshheading:11374047-Laparoscopy,
pubmed-meshheading:11374047-Rabbits,
pubmed-meshheading:11374047-Random Allocation,
pubmed-meshheading:11374047-Recurrence,
pubmed-meshheading:11374047-Statistics, Nonparametric,
pubmed-meshheading:11374047-Tissue Adhesions
|
pubmed:year |
2001
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Comparison of adhesion reformation after laparoscopic and conventional adhesiolysis in an animal model.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Surgery, Technical University, Pauwelsstrasse 30, D-52074 Aachen, Germany. andreas.tittel@post.rwth-aachen.de
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study
|