Linked Life Data

11373557

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/11373557

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
5
pubmed:dateCreated
2001-5-24
pubmed:abstractText
Although many of the health and safety issues associated with breast augmentation have been thoroughly discussed over the past decade, the literature is remarkably silent regarding postmastectomy reconstruction of the previously augmented breast. A retrospective review of the senior author's reconstructive practice was performed for the years 1983 through March of 1999, revealing 21 women who underwent postmastectomy breast reconstruction after previous breast augmentation. For purposes of measuring aesthetic results, these 21 patients were matched to a carefully selected control group of 15 patients. They were also compared with other, larger populations, including 777 of the senior author's other breast reconstructions, the breast cancer registry at the Lombardi Cancer Center in Washington, D.C., and several large, published epidemiologic studies. The interval between the previous augmentation and the diagnosis of breast cancer ranged from 9 months to 18 years, with a mean of 9.3 years. None of the previous augmentation implants was ruptured at the time of mastectomy. Of the nine patients with previous subpectoral augmentation, cancer was detected mammographically in five (56 percent), whereas of the 12 patients with previous subglandular augmentation, cancer was first detected mammographically in only three (25 percent). This difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.2). Overall, eight of the study patients' tumors (38 percent) were first detected mammographically, which is similar to other published reports of breast cancer patients in the general population. Seventy-one percent of the 21 study patients were node-negative, which also compares favorably with other published series. Sixteen of the women with previous augmentation (76 percent) had purely prosthetic reconstructions. Flaps were used in the other five reconstructions (23 percent): three latissimus dorsi flaps (14 percent) and two transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps (9 percent). All five flaps were used in patients who had undergone radiation therapy. Throughout the senior author's entire reconstructive practice history, transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps were more frequently used [282 of 777 nonaugmented reconstructions (36 percent)], whereas latissimus dorsi flaps were less frequently used [17 of 777 nonaugmented reconstructions (2.2 percent)] (p < 0.001). The cosmetic results of the breast reconstructions in the previously augmented study group were generally good-to-excellent, with a mean score by blinded observers of 3.35 of a possible 4.0. These results were comparable to or better than those in the matched controls, who scored a mean of 3.0.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Apr
pubmed:issn
0032-1052
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:day
15
pubmed:volume
107
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
1167-76
pubmed:dateRevised
2011-2-16
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2001
pubmed:articleTitle
Postmastectomy reconstruction of the previously augmented breast: diagnosis, staging, methodology, and outcome.
pubmed:affiliation
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3800 Reservoir Road N.W., Washington DC 20007, USA. spears@gunet.georgetown.edu
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article