rdf:type |
|
lifeskim:mentions |
|
pubmed:issue |
4
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2001-3-29
|
pubmed:abstractText |
This prospective clinical trial focuses on pain and quality of life (QOL) after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) grafting versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal |
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:issn |
1098-3511
|
pubmed:author |
|
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
2
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
290-5; discussion 295-6
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:11276489-Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:11276489-Coronary Artery Bypass,
pubmed-meshheading:11276489-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:11276489-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:11276489-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:11276489-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:11276489-Pain, Postoperative,
pubmed-meshheading:11276489-Prospective Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:11276489-Quality of Life,
pubmed-meshheading:11276489-Surgical Procedures, Minimally Invasive
|
pubmed:year |
1999
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Comparison of MIDCAP versus conventional CABG surgery regarding pain and quality of life.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Klinik für Herzchirurgie, Herzzentrum, Universität Leipzig, Germany.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Clinical Trial,
Comparative Study
|