Linked Life Data

11262703

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/11262703

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
3
pubmed:dateCreated
2001-3-23
pubmed:abstractText
The present study examines the relation between a set of computerized neuropsychological measures, Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM), and a set of traditional clinical neuropsychological tests. Both sets of tests have been employed in recent studies of mild brain injury. Factor analysis and stepwise regression indicate that both sets of tests measure similar underlying constructs of cognitive processing speed, resistance to interference, and working memory. The present findings indicate strong concordance between computerized and traditional neuropsychological measures and support the construct validity of ANAM and similar procedures.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Aug
pubmed:issn
1385-4046
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
14
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
287-94
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-6-1
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2000
pubmed:articleTitle
Factor analysis of computerized and traditional tests used in mild brain injury research.
pubmed:affiliation
National Rehabilitation Hospital, Washington DC 20010, USA. jxb2@mhg.edu
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study