Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
3 Pt 1
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
1979-10-26
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
Eight hundred stapedectomies were analyzed to evaluate the long-term results with four prostheses. It was concluded that limitation of fenestra size played a most important part in the outcome of stapedectomy, especially in regard to the preservation of high-frequency bone conduction response over prolonged periods. Other advantages deriving from small fenestra stapedectomy included significantly fewer fistulae and severe sensorineural losses.
|
| pubmed:language |
eng
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:issn |
0161-6439
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:volume |
86
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
ORL488-91
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2007-11-15
|
| pubmed:meshHeading | |
| pubmed:articleTitle |
The case for small fenestra stapedectomy.
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|