Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
2001-3-15
pubmed:abstractText
An analysis of binaural detection and new data that elucidate the nature and precision of normalization that must be assumed if binaural detection is accomplished via mechanisms that effectively compute the coefficient of cross correlation is presented. Based on that analysis, it is argued that the precision of normalization required to remove deleterious effects resulting from variations in the levels of the stimuli is so great that it is highly unlikely that normalization, per se, actually occurs as part of binarual processing. Instead, it appears more likely that binaural processing is accomplished via "subtractive" mechanisms, such as the one originally described by Durlach [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 35, 1206-1218 (1963)]. Within that framework, deleterious effects that could result from variations in the levels of the stimuli simply do not arise.
pubmed:grant
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Feb
pubmed:issn
0001-4966
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
109
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
830-3
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-14
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2001
pubmed:articleTitle
A consideration of the normalization that is typically included in correlation-based models of binaural detection.
pubmed:publicationType
Letter, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.