Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/11233786
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
2
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2001-3-6
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Cryopreservation of equine embryos with conventional slow-cooling procedures has proven challenging. An alternative approach is vitrification, which can minimize chilling injuries by increasing the rates of cooling and warming. The open pulled straw (OPS) and cryoloop have been used for very rapid cooling and warming rates. The objective of this experiment was to compare efficacy of vitrification of embryos in OPS and the cryoloop to conventional slow cool procedures using 0.25 mL straws. Grade 1 or 2 morulae and early blastocysts (< or = 300 microm in diameter) were recovered from mares on Day 6 or 7 post ovulation. Twenty-seven embryos were assigned to three cryopreservation treatments: (1) conventional slow cooling (0.5 degrees C/min) with 1.8 M ethylene glycol (EG) and 0.1 M sucrose, (4) vitrification in OPS in 16.5% EG, 16.5% DMSO and 0.5 M sucrose, or (3) vitrification with a cryoloop in 17.5% EG, 17.5% DMSO, 1 M sucrose and 0.25 microM ficoll. Embryos were evaluated for size and morphological quality (Grade 1 to 4) before freezing, after thawing, and after culture for 20 h. In addition, propidium iodide (PI) and Hoechst 33342 staining were used to assess percent live cells after culture. There were no differences (P > 0.1) in morphological grade or percent live cells among methods. Mean grades for embryos after culture were 2.9 +/- 0.2, 3.1 +/- 0.1, and 3.3 +/- 0.2 for conventional slow cooling, OPS and cryoloop methods, respectively. Embryo grade and percent live cells were correlated, r = 0.66 (P < 0.004). Thus OPS and the cryoloop were similarly effective to conventional slow-cooling procedures for cryopreserving small equine embryos.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:chemical | |
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Jan
|
pubmed:issn |
0093-691X
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:day |
15
|
pubmed:volume |
55
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
607-13
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:11233786-Animals,
pubmed-meshheading:11233786-Benzimidazoles,
pubmed-meshheading:11233786-Cryopreservation,
pubmed-meshheading:11233786-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:11233786-Fluorescent Dyes,
pubmed-meshheading:11233786-Horses,
pubmed-meshheading:11233786-Insemination, Artificial,
pubmed-meshheading:11233786-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:11233786-Microscopy, Fluorescence,
pubmed-meshheading:11233786-Pregnancy,
pubmed-meshheading:11233786-Propidium
|
pubmed:year |
2001
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Cryopreservation of equine embryos by open pulled straw, cryoloop, or conventional slow cooling methods.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80523, USA.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|