Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
1
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1975-6-2
|
pubmed:abstractText |
In our 1st series of examinations the Grant's 4-minutes-tonography, combined with waterdrinking (Becker), was compared with Leydhecker's modification of 7-minutes-tonography. Out of 60 healthy eyes were 13,3% false-positive with the 4-minutes-tonography, combined with waterdrinking, however with the 7-minutes-tonography none of these were glaucoma-suspicious. For 92 glaucoma-suspicious eyes, which were tested with both methods, the 7-minutes-tonography proved to be much more valuable. Leydhecker's value P3/CL3-7 offers 38,4% positive results at a starting pressure of 18-22 mm Hg, and 51,1% positive results at a starting pressure of 20-24 mmHg. Grant's 4-minutes-tonography, combined with waterdrinking (Becker), may show suspicious values at pressures of 18-22 mm Hg, however is not able to register with certainty existing pathological findings. In 2nd series of examinations 54 eyes with proven glaucoma chronicum simplex were tested with the 7-minutes-tonography. It showed a reliability of 83%.
|
pubmed:language |
ger
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:chemical | |
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Jan
|
pubmed:issn |
0023-2165
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
166
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
59-64
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2009-11-11
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:1117645-Chronic Disease,
pubmed-meshheading:1117645-Diagnostic Errors,
pubmed-meshheading:1117645-Glaucoma,
pubmed-meshheading:1117645-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:1117645-Intraocular Pressure,
pubmed-meshheading:1117645-Time Factors,
pubmed-meshheading:1117645-Tonometry, Ocular,
pubmed-meshheading:1117645-Water
|
pubmed:year |
1975
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
[Tonography test according to Leydhecker. Clinical comparison by tonography according to Grant (author's transl)].
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
English Abstract
|