Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
2001-2-22
pubmed:abstractText
In 2000, the number of completely sequenced eukaryotic genomes increased to four. The addition of Drosophila and Arabidopsis into this cohort permits additional insights into the processes that have shaped evolution. Analysis and comparisons of both completed genomes and partially sequenced genomes have already shed light on mechanisms such as gene duplication and gene loss that have long been hypothesized to be major forces in speciation. Indeed, duplicate gene pairs in Saccharomyces, Arabidopsis, Caenorhabditis and Drosophila are high: 30%, 60%, 48% and 40%, respectively. Evidence of horizontal gene-transfer, thought to be a major evolutionary force in bacteria, has been found in Arabidopsis. The release of the 'first draft' of the human genome sequence in 2000 heralds a new stage of biological study. Understanding the as-yet-unannotated human genome will be largely based on conclusions, techniques and tools developed during the analysis and comparison of the genome of these four model organisms.
pubmed:grant
pubmed:commentsCorrections
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/11166654-10400922, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/11166654-10508839, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/11166654-10591208, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/11166654-10731134, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/11166654-10779483, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/11166654-10802651, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/11166654-10830953, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/11166654-10899144, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/11166654-10908582, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/11166654-10984448, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/11166654-11016957, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/11166654-11017083, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/11166654-11118137, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/11166654-11130711, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/11166654-2231712, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/11166654-8743695, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/11166654-9851918
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Feb
pubmed:issn
1367-5931
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
5
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
86-9
pubmed:dateRevised
2011-7-25
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2001
pubmed:articleTitle
Genome comparisons highlight similarity and diversity within the eukaryotic kingdoms.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305-5120, USA.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Review