Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/11165289
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
2
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2001-2-22
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The common platform translation paradigm used in balance control studies employs a disturbance event that applies non-muscular forces to the body for the duration of the disturbance. Previous research has explored the process of constructing the balance recovery by considering these perturbations to be trigger events, not events with an ongoing force application timeline. The purpose of this study was to quantify the effect of muscular and non-muscular torques on post-perturbation balance with particular interest in the role of the external perturbation in balance recovery. Five young adult males experienced backward translations of the support surface at three different speeds. Integration intervals were defined for each segment and angular impulses were calculated for a period of increasing angular momentum (destabilization), and a period of decreasing angular momentum (restabilization). Destabilization of distal segments was primarily due to impulse generated by the motion of the support surface. For the trunk, however, muscle and motion-dependent sources contributed most to increasing momentum. Restabilization of distal segments was achieved by muscle and platform impulses while trunk restabilization was achieved by muscle and motion-dependent terms in opposition to gravity. Increased platform speed resulted in increased muscular contribution only in the control of the trunk, while demand on distal musculature decreased with change in platform speed as the platform contribution to restabilization increased in these segments. Therefore, impulses from non-muscular sources, including the perturbation itself, are significant modifiers of the response to balance disturbances and must be accounted for in balance research.
|
pubmed:grant | |
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Feb
|
pubmed:issn |
0021-9290
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
34
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
245-50
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2009-11-11
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:11165289-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:11165289-Biomechanics,
pubmed-meshheading:11165289-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:11165289-Kinetics,
pubmed-meshheading:11165289-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:11165289-Muscle, Skeletal,
pubmed-meshheading:11165289-Postural Balance,
pubmed-meshheading:11165289-Posture,
pubmed-meshheading:11165289-Torque
|
pubmed:year |
2001
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
How do non-muscular torques contribute to the kinetics of postural recovery following a support surface translation?
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Mary Free Bed Hospital and Rehabilitation Center, Motion Analysis Center, Mary Free Bed Hospital & Rehabilitation Center, 235 Wealthy St. SE, 49503, Grand Rapids, MI, USA. kbothner@mfbrc.com
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
|