Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
6
pubmed:dateCreated
2001-1-8
pubmed:abstractText
When managing a new neurologic deficit after carotid endarterectomy (CEA), the surgeon is often preoccupied with determining the cause of the problem, requesting diagnostics tests, and deciding whether the patient should be surgically reexplored. The goal of this study was to analyze a series of perioperative neurologic events and to determine if careful analysis of their timing and mechanisms can predict which cases are likely to improve with reoperation.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Dec
pubmed:issn
0741-5214
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
32
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
1062-70
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed-meshheading:11107077-Aged, pubmed-meshheading:11107077-Brain Ischemia, pubmed-meshheading:11107077-Central Nervous System Diseases, pubmed-meshheading:11107077-Cerebral Hemorrhage, pubmed-meshheading:11107077-Data Interpretation, Statistical, pubmed-meshheading:11107077-Endarterectomy, Carotid, pubmed-meshheading:11107077-Female, pubmed-meshheading:11107077-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:11107077-Intraoperative Complications, pubmed-meshheading:11107077-Male, pubmed-meshheading:11107077-Prognosis, pubmed-meshheading:11107077-Prospective Studies, pubmed-meshheading:11107077-Reoperation, pubmed-meshheading:11107077-Risk Factors, pubmed-meshheading:11107077-Stroke, pubmed-meshheading:11107077-Thromboembolism, pubmed-meshheading:11107077-Time Factors, pubmed-meshheading:11107077-Treatment Outcome
pubmed:year
2000
pubmed:articleTitle
Immediate reexploration for the perioperative neurologic event after carotid endarterectomy: is it worthwhile?
pubmed:affiliation
Division of Vascular Surgery, New York University Medical Center, New York 10016, USA.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study