Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/11094363
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
5
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2000-12-8
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Forty children displaying Class II Division 1 malocclusion were involved in a prospective magnetic resonance image investigation to evaluate the effects of Twin-block functional appliances on the temporomandibular joints. None of these children had clinical signs or symptoms of temporomandibular disorders. Nineteen children were treated with a Clark Twin-block appliance for 6 months; the other 21 children received no treatment and served as controls. Comparison between control and Clark Twin-block groups suggested that reduction of the condylar axial angle represents a feature of untreated Class II growth patterns, whereas axial angle stability with Clark Twin-block therapy may suggest alteration of condylar growth direction. Condyles that were positioned at the crest of the articular eminence by the Clark Twin-block at the beginning of treatment had reseated back into the glenoid fossa after 6 months. However, 75% of the condyles were more anteriorly positioned in successfully treated Clark Twin-block cases. There was no clear evidence of remodeling of the glenoid fossa at the eminence as a result of Clark Twin-block treatment. The initial prevalence of disk displacements for the combined groups was 7.5% anterior, 5% medial, and 12.5% for lateral disk displacement. Clark Twin-block therapy had neither positive nor negative effects on disk position, and there was no convincing evidence that the disk was recaptured.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
D
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Nov
|
pubmed:issn |
0889-5406
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
118
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
494-504
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2009-11-3
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:11094363-Adaptation, Physiological,
pubmed-meshheading:11094363-Adolescent,
pubmed-meshheading:11094363-Calibration,
pubmed-meshheading:11094363-Cephalometry,
pubmed-meshheading:11094363-Child,
pubmed-meshheading:11094363-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:11094363-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:11094363-Magnetic Resonance Imaging,
pubmed-meshheading:11094363-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:11094363-Malocclusion, Angle Class II,
pubmed-meshheading:11094363-Mandibular Condyle,
pubmed-meshheading:11094363-Orthodontic Appliances, Functional,
pubmed-meshheading:11094363-Outcome Assessment (Health Care),
pubmed-meshheading:11094363-Prospective Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:11094363-Temporomandibular Joint
|
pubmed:year |
2000
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
A prospective study of Twin-block appliance therapy assessed by magnetic resonance imaging.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Dental School, The University of Adelaide, South Australia.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Clinical Trial,
Controlled Clinical Trial,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|