Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
2000-11-13
pubmed:abstractText
Daptomycin MICs were determined for 844 Gram-positive bacteria in three concentrations of Ca(++) and compared with the MICs of vancomycin and teicoplanin. Daptomycin was twofold to fourfold more active against most species when tested in 50 microg/ml of Ca(++) than in 25 microg/ml. In 50 microg/ml of Ca(++) daptomycin was more active against methicillin-resistant staphylococci and vancomycin-resistant enterococci than teicoplanin or vancomycin; 100% of these isolates were susceptible to < or =2.0 microg/ml of daptomycin. Different lots of Mueller-Hinton agar were variable in Ca(++) content, and daptomycin disk diffusion zone diameters were affected, i.e., zones were 1 to 15 mm smaller on one lot of agar with only 6 microg/ml of Ca(++) compared to another lot with 28 microg/ml. The previously proposed daptomycin interpretive breakpoints performed satisfactorily when MICs were determined in Mueller-Hinton broth with 50 microg/ml of Ca(++) and when the agar gave appropriate zones with quality control strains. To define those control limits, replicate tests with four quality control strains were performed in ten laboratories using broth microdilution tests (with Ca(++) supplemented broth) and disk diffusion tests on Mueller-Hinton agar without cation adjustments.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Sep
pubmed:issn
0732-8893
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
38
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
51-8
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2000
pubmed:articleTitle
Daptomycin susceptibility tests: interpretive criteria, quality control, and effect of calcium on in vitro tests.
pubmed:affiliation
The Clinical Microbiology Institute, 9725 SW Commerce Circle, Wilsonville, OR 97070, USA. cmi@hevanet.com
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Multicenter Study