Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/10993419
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
9 Suppl
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2000-12-26
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Accelerometry-based activity monitors offer promise for the assessment of free-living physical activity. They provide an objective record of frequency, intensity, and duration of physical activity with minimal burden on participants. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the absolute and relative validity of three contemporary activity monitors (Computer Science and Applications, Inc. [CSA], Tritrac, and Biotrainer) under both laboratory and field conditions.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Sep
|
pubmed:issn |
0195-9131
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
32
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
S489-97
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:10993419-Activities of Daily Living,
pubmed-meshheading:10993419-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:10993419-Exercise Test,
pubmed-meshheading:10993419-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:10993419-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:10993419-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:10993419-Motion,
pubmed-meshheading:10993419-Physical Fitness,
pubmed-meshheading:10993419-Reproducibility of Results,
pubmed-meshheading:10993419-Sensitivity and Specificity
|
pubmed:year |
2000
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
A comparative evaluation of three accelerometry-based physical activity monitors.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Health and Human Performance Department, Iowa State University, Ames 50011, USA. gwelk@iastate.edu
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't,
Evaluation Studies
|