10951920

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/10951920

Download in:

Switch to

Custom View

Named Graph Language Inference

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
Predicate	Object
rdf:type	pubmed:Citation
lifeskim:mentions	umls-concept:C0004271, umls-concept:C0086267, umls-concept:C0205476, umls-concept:C0376558, umls-concept:C0444930, umls-concept:C0679006, umls-concept:C0702221, umls-concept:C1709627
pubmed:issue	4
pubmed:dateCreated	2000-11-27
pubmed:abstractText	To assess whether UK and US health care professionals share the views of medical ethicists about medical futility, withdrawing/withholding treatment, ordinary/extraordinary interventions, and the doctrine of double effect. DESIGN, SUBJECTS AND SETTING: A 138-item attitudinal questionnaire completed by 469 UK nurses studying the Open University course on "Death and Dying" was compared with a similar questionnaire administered to 759 US nurses and 687 US doctors taking the Hastings Center course on "Decisions near the End of Life".
pubmed:commentsCorrections	http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/10951920-10693307, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/10951920-10951914, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/10951920-7776342, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/10951920-8417600, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/10951920-9219022, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/10951920-9220326, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/10951920-9451600, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/10951920-9451605, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/10951920-9539042, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/10951920-9589291
pubmed:keyword	http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/keyword/Death and Euthanasia, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/keyword/Empirical Approach
pubmed:language	eng
pubmed:journal	http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/journal/7513619
pubmed:citationSubset	E
pubmed:status	MEDLINE
pubmed:month	Aug
pubmed:issn	0306-6800
pubmed:author	pubmed-author:DickensonD LDL
pubmed:issnType	Print
pubmed:volume	26
pubmed:owner	NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete	Y
pubmed:pagination	254-60
pubmed:dateRevised	2009-11-18
pubmed:meshHeading	pubmed-meshheading:10951920-Attitude of Health Personnel, pubmed-meshheading:10951920-Attitude to Death, pubmed-meshheading:10951920-Decision Making, pubmed-meshheading:10951920-Double Effect Principle, pubmed-meshheading:10951920-Ethicists, pubmed-meshheading:10951920-Ethics, pubmed-meshheading:10951920-Ethics, Medical, pubmed-meshheading:10951920-Euthanasia, pubmed-meshheading:10951920-Euthanasia, Active, pubmed-meshheading:10951920-Great Britain, pubmed-meshheading:10951920-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:10951920-Intention, pubmed-meshheading:10951920-Internationality, pubmed-meshheading:10951920-Life Support Care, pubmed-meshheading:10951920-Medical Futility, pubmed-meshheading:10951920-Morals, pubmed-meshheading:10951920-Motivation, pubmed-meshheading:10951920-Nurses, pubmed-meshheading:10951920-Physicians, pubmed-meshheading:10951920-Questionnaires, pubmed-meshheading:10951920-Social Values, pubmed-meshheading:10951920-Terminal Care, pubmed-meshheading:10951920-United States, pubmed-meshheading:10951920-Withholding Treatment
pubmed:year	2000
pubmed:articleTitle	Are medical ethicists out of touch? Practitioner attitudes in the US and UK towards decisions at the end of life.
pubmed:affiliation	Imperial College School of Medicine, London.
pubmed:publicationType	Journal Article, Comparative Study, Comment