10935002

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/10935002

Download in:

Switch to

Custom View

Named Graph Language Inference

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
Predicate	Object
rdf:type	pubmed:Citation
lifeskim:mentions	umls-concept:C0001792, umls-concept:C0002911, umls-concept:C0205246
pubmed:issue	1
pubmed:dateCreated	2000-8-29
pubmed:abstractText	Although clinical perceptions and theoretic considerations suggest regional anesthesia should be safer than general anesthesia in elderly patients, current studies indicate no difference in outcomes. Regional anesthesia may still prove superior to general anesthesia if the right patient population or right endpoints are identified for comparison. A study of consequence of outcome, comparing the two approaches has created an expansion of the definition of anesthesia-related complications.
pubmed:language	eng
pubmed:journal	http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/journal/8810131
pubmed:citationSubset	IM
pubmed:status	MEDLINE
pubmed:month	Mar
pubmed:issn	0889-8537
pubmed:author	pubmed-author:RoyR CRC
pubmed:issnType	Print
pubmed:volume	18
pubmed:owner	NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete	Y
pubmed:pagination	91-104, vii
pubmed:dateRevised	2005-11-16
pubmed:meshHeading	pubmed-meshheading:10935002-Aged, pubmed-meshheading:10935002-Anesthesia, Conduction, pubmed-meshheading:10935002-Anesthesia, General, pubmed-meshheading:10935002-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:10935002-Surgical Procedures, Operative
pubmed:year	2000
pubmed:articleTitle	Choosing general versus regional anesthesia for the elderly.
pubmed:affiliation	Department of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA. rroy@wfubmc.edu
pubmed:publicationType	Journal Article, Review