Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/10933649
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
2
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2000-10-19
|
pubmed:abstractText |
We investigated the comparative efficacy and safety of dirithromycin and erythromycin in the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections in this double-blind, randomized, multicentre study, in which 439 patients were randomized to treatment with dirithromycin (500 mg daily for 5 days) or erythromycin (250 mg every 6 h for 7 days). All randomized patients were included in the termination analysis, which showed that 187 of 220 (85.0%) dirithromycin recipients and 177 of 219 (80.8%) erythromycin recipients were clinically cured or improved (95% confidence interval (CI) -3.0% to +11.4%). In the termination analysis of the 211 bacteriologically evaluable patients, clinical cure or improvement occurred in 83 of 100 (83%) dirithromycin recipients and in 89 of 111 (80.2%) erythromycin recipients (95% CI -7.8% to +13.4%), and bacteriological eradication occurred in 85 of 100 (85%) and 89 of 111 (80.2%), respectively. Adverse events were similar in incidence and nature between the two groups, except that there was less nausea with dirithromycin (3.6% versus 8.2%; P = 0.042). Ten of 220 (4.5%) dirithromycin recipients and 27 of 219 (12.3%) erythromycin recipients returned >20% of their prescribed medication (P = 0.033). In the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections, dirithromycin (500 mg daily for 5 days) was comparable in efficacy to, and caused significantly less nausea than, erythromycin (250 mg every 6 h for 7 days). Compliance with the dirithromycin regimen was superior to that with the erythromycin regimen.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:chemical | |
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Aug
|
pubmed:issn |
0305-7453
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
46
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
255-62
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:10933649-Adolescent,
pubmed-meshheading:10933649-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:10933649-Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:10933649-Aged, 80 and over,
pubmed-meshheading:10933649-Anti-Bacterial Agents,
pubmed-meshheading:10933649-Child,
pubmed-meshheading:10933649-Double-Blind Method,
pubmed-meshheading:10933649-Erythromycin,
pubmed-meshheading:10933649-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:10933649-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:10933649-Macrolides,
pubmed-meshheading:10933649-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:10933649-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:10933649-Patient Compliance,
pubmed-meshheading:10933649-Skin Diseases, Infectious,
pubmed-meshheading:10933649-Soft Tissue Infections,
pubmed-meshheading:10933649-Treatment Outcome
|
pubmed:year |
2000
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Comparative efficacy of 5 days of dirithromycin and 7 days of erythromycin in skin and soft tissue infections.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN 46285, USA. mwasilewski@lilly.com
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Clinical Trial,
Comparative Study,
Randomized Controlled Trial,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't,
Multicenter Study
|