Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
2000-10-10
pubmed:abstractText
The majority of reports describing the natural history and prognosis of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN 1) utilize phenotypic rather than molecular genetic criteria to establish a diagnosis of MEN 1. OBJECTIVES AND PATIENTS: We sought to determine the spectrum of endocrine abnormality amongst 152 members (64 gene carriers and 88 noncarriers) of a large MEN 1 family in whom a determination of MEN 1 status had previously been made by phenotype screening. The predictive utility of both clinical and molecular screening techniques are described.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Aug
pubmed:issn
0300-0664
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
53
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
205-11
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2000
pubmed:articleTitle
Phenotype and phenocopy: the relationship between genotype and clinical phenotype in a single large family with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN 1).
pubmed:affiliation
Departments of Diabetes and Endocrine Services; Clinical Chemistry, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Australia. jburges@postoffice.utas.edu.au
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't