Linked Life Data

10836385

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/10836385

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
8
pubmed:dateCreated
2000-6-13
pubmed:abstractText
It is still debated whether fetal or adult porcine islets should be the preferred choice for future clinical islet xenotransplantation. Each type of islet preparation has advantages and disadvantages compared with the other. Here we present a direct comparison between fetal and adult porcine islets with regard to Gal alpha(1,3)Gal expression, immunoglobulin and complement binding, and cytotoxicity after exposure to fresh human serum.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Apr
pubmed:issn
0041-1337
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:day
27
pubmed:volume
69
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
1711-7
pubmed:dateRevised
2008-11-21
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2000
pubmed:articleTitle
A comparison of fetal and adult porcine islets with regard to Gal alpha (1,3)Gal expression and the role of human immunoglobulins and complement in islet cell cytotoxicity.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Transplantation Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge Hospital, Sweden.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't