Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:10824370rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10824370lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1704632lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10824370lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0871261lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10824370lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2911692lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10824370lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1706817lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10824370lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1998467lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10824370pubmed:issue2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10824370pubmed:dateCreated2000-6-12lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10824370pubmed:abstractTextIn this journal, Cummins et al reported an experiment that examined clinicians' predictions of causes of death from subjects' pre-morbid photographs. They found that clinicians performed at chance. The validity of two of their other conclusions are challenged. First, that clinicians routinely form impressions of how a person will die from their appearance. Second, that certain health professionals use common judgements to form these impressions. These claims are found to be based upon non-falsifiable hypothesis and inappropriate statistics; hence, an experiment employing pictures of feet (or any arbitrary personal detail) would have led the authors to the same conclusions.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10824370pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10824370pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10824370pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10824370pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10824370pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10824370pubmed:monthMarlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10824370pubmed:issn1368-5031lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10824370pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LewisM BMBlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10824370pubmed:authorpubmed-author:EllisH DHDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10824370pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10824370pubmed:volume54lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10824370pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10824370pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10824370pubmed:pagination126-7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10824370pubmed:dateRevised2007-2-14lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10824370pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10824370...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10824370pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10824370...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10824370pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10824370...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10824370pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10824370...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10824370pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10824370...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10824370pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10824370...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10824370pubmed:year2000lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10824370pubmed:articleTitleMistaken first impressions: a response.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10824370pubmed:affiliationSchool of Psychology, Cardiff University, UK.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10824370pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10824370pubmed:publicationTypeCommentlld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:10824370lld:pubmed