Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/10824370
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
2
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2000-6-12
|
pubmed:abstractText |
In this journal, Cummins et al reported an experiment that examined clinicians' predictions of causes of death from subjects' pre-morbid photographs. They found that clinicians performed at chance. The validity of two of their other conclusions are challenged. First, that clinicians routinely form impressions of how a person will die from their appearance. Second, that certain health professionals use common judgements to form these impressions. These claims are found to be based upon non-falsifiable hypothesis and inappropriate statistics; hence, an experiment employing pictures of feet (or any arbitrary personal detail) would have led the authors to the same conclusions.
|
pubmed:commentsCorrections | |
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Mar
|
pubmed:issn |
1368-5031
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
54
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
126-7
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2007-2-14
|
pubmed:meshHeading | |
pubmed:year |
2000
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Mistaken first impressions: a response.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
School of Psychology, Cardiff University, UK.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comment
|