Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/10796433
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
2
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2000-7-6
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The primary rationale for surgery for disc prolapse is to relieve nerve root irritation or compression due to herniated disc material. Claims of the merits of alternative surgical procedures are made without clear evidence about clinical outcomes. The objective of this review was to assess the effects of surgical interventions for the treatment of lumbar disc prolapse.
|
pubmed:commentsCorrections | |
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:issn |
1469-493X
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
CD001350
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2011-11-17
|
pubmed:meshHeading | |
pubmed:year |
2000
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Surgery for lumbar disc prolapse.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Clinical Research Unit, Princess Margaret Rose, Orthopaedic Hospital, Edinburgh EH10 7ED, UK. J.N.A.Gibson@ed.ac.uk
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Review
|