10773606

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/10773606

Download in:

Switch to

Custom View

Named Graph Language Inference

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
Predicate	Object
rdf:type	pubmed:Citation
lifeskim:mentions	umls-concept:C0009861, umls-concept:C0023185, umls-concept:C0242479, umls-concept:C0442592
pubmed:issue	2
pubmed:dateCreated	2000-7-11
pubmed:keyword	http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/keyword/Attitude, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/keyword/Behavior, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/keyword/Education, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/keyword/Evaluation, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/keyword/Evaluation Report, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/keyword/Family Planning, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/keyword/Family Planning Personnel, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/keyword/Family Planning Programs, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/keyword/Family Planning Training, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/keyword/INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/keyword/Psychological Factors, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/keyword/Staff Attitude, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/keyword/Training Programs, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/keyword/Workshops
pubmed:language	eng
pubmed:journal	http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/journal/8000474
pubmed:citationSubset	IM
pubmed:status	MEDLINE
pubmed:month	Apr
pubmed:issn	0144-8625
pubmed:author	pubmed-author:BaraitserPP, pubmed-author:HernoAA, pubmed-author:WebbSS
pubmed:issnType	Print
pubmed:volume	26
pubmed:owner	NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete	Y
pubmed:pagination	107-8
pubmed:dateRevised	2006-11-15
pubmed:otherAbstract	PIP: This study aimed to evaluate the acceptability of joint learning between clinical and nonclinical members of family planning teams. A multidisciplinary workshop was facilitated by nonexpert facilitators comprising representatives from all disciplines who had received specific training. The workshop included sessions in which clinical and nonclinical staff learned separately and together. The program was evaluated using a questionnaire documenting participants' experience of learning in multidisciplinary teams, a pre- and post-workshop self-assessment of knowledge, a self-assessment of the predicted and actual effect of the workshop on clinical practice, and telephone interviews with the facilitators. Overall, results show that peer-facilitated multidisciplinary learning for clinical and nonclinical staff together is an acceptable form of staff training for family planning teams. Most participants felt comfortable in their learning groups and few reported feeling constrained by inter- or intradisciplinary hierarchies. In conclusion, the exclusion of nonclinical staff from interdisciplinary learning programs represents a missed opportunity for the exchange of ideas between family planning clinic teams.
pubmed:meshHeading	pubmed-meshheading:10773606-Education, pubmed-meshheading:10773606-Family Planning Services, pubmed-meshheading:10773606-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:10773606-Interprofessional Relations, pubmed-meshheading:10773606-Staff Development
pubmed:year	2000
pubmed:articleTitle	Multidisciplinary learning in family planning clinics.
pubmed:affiliation	Department of Family Planning, Community Health South London, St Giles Road, London, UK.
pubmed:publicationType	Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't