Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
4
pubmed:dateCreated
2000-4-27
pubmed:abstractText
Sampling methods to determine occupational exposures to metalworking fluid mists are subject to bias. Light-scattering devices may respond differently to variations in particle size, shape, and refractive index. Gravimetric samplers are prone to evaporative losses of semi-volatile components. The performance of two light scattering devices, an electrostatic precipitator, and filters followed by gravimetric analysis was investigated when measuring metalworking fluid mist in laboratory and field settings. Laboratory tests with soluble oil and field tests with soluble oil, straight oil, and semi-synthetic fluid showed significant evaporative losses from filters. Light-scattering devices tended to overestimate mist concentrations when mass median diameters were less than about 2 microns and to underestimate mist concentrations when mass median diameters were larger. Filters will underestimate occupational exposures to metalworking fluid mists when semi-volatile components are present.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Apr
pubmed:issn
1047-322X
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
15
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
370-9
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2000
pubmed:articleTitle
Mist concentration measurements. II: Laboratory and field evaluations.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't