Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/10740913
Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
2
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
2000-4-26
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
This article provides a comparative review of nine commercially available software programs: A+ Test Manager and Test Taker, CATSoftware, Diploma 97, Examaker for Windows, FastTEST, Microtest Pro, Pedagogue, Question Mark, and Test Construction Set. Issues for using test development software are covered including security, pedagogical uses, and test design and administration. Nurse educators are encouraged to consider the unique needs of each setting when selecting a software package to support test development and administration.
|
| pubmed:language |
eng
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:issn |
0736-8593
|
| pubmed:author |
pubmed-author:BillingsD MDM,
pubmed-author:CummingsR BRB,
pubmed-author:DorneyEE,
pubmed-author:Hodson-CarltonKK,
pubmed-author:JeffriesP RPR,
pubmed-author:KirkpatrickJ MJM,
pubmed-author:RobinsonLL,
pubmed-author:RowlesC JCJ,
pubmed-author:SchaferK MKM,
pubmed-author:SiktbergLL,
pubmed-author:SmolenRR,
pubmed-author:TaylorSS
|
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:volume |
18
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
72-86
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
| pubmed:meshHeading | |
| pubmed:articleTitle |
Computerized test development software. A comparative review updated.
|
| pubmed:affiliation |
Purdue University School of Nursing, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907-1337, USA. jmkirk@purdue.edu
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
Review
|