Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
3
pubmed:dateCreated
2000-3-28
pubmed:abstractText
Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is an important new paradigm of the medical profession. While the quantitative approach of EBM has its place, clinical medicine must take into account many subtleties that EBM fails to consider. In this article, the authors describe three caveats to this quantitative approach: (1) the detection of "maybe disease" (physiologic, anatomic, or histologic abnormalities that may not ever be overtly expressed in the patient's lifetime) inflates apparent diagnostic test performance; (2) probability revision is valuable primarily as an exercise to gain qualitative insights; and (3) patients are likely to be interested more than just central tendencies in making treatment decisions. They then consider some challenging questions facing clinician-educators: how do they prepare students for situations where there is an absence of rigorous evidence? Should they teach students that the burden of proof lies in demonstrating efficacy or in demonstrating ineffectiveness? And what should they tell students about when to seek evidence to aid diagnostic and treatment decisions?
pubmed:commentsCorrections
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Mar
pubmed:issn
1040-2446
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
75
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
235-40
pubmed:dateRevised
2004-11-17
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2000
pubmed:articleTitle
Teaching evidence-based medicine: caveats and challenges.
pubmed:affiliation
Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA. h.gilbert.welch@dartmouth.edu
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article