Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
2000-4-4
pubmed:abstractText
Fenfluramine and dexfenfluramine were popular and widely used antiobesity agents until they were withdrawn from the market in 1997. Even though early research appeared to demonstrate their safety, serious concerns were raised about these medications. Primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH) was a known side effect, but it was believed that the health benefits of weight loss compensated for the risk of PPH. With widespread use of these agents, 2 other conditions--valvular heart disease and neurotoxicity--were reported as potential side effects. In this paper, we review the evidence for these adverse events and whether the current data meet federal and Texas legal standards for admissibility. We discuss also the basis for health claims against physicians, and the scientific and legal challenges faced by both plaintiffs and defendants.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Feb
pubmed:issn
0040-4470
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
96
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
48-56
pubmed:dateRevised
2010-11-18
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2000
pubmed:articleTitle
Scientific and legal issues in fenfluramine/dexfenfluramine litigation.
pubmed:affiliation
University of Missouri-Kansas City, Mid America Heart Institute 64110, USA.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Review, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't