Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
10
pubmed:dateCreated
2000-4-11
pubmed:abstractText
MOTIVATION: Should reports on molecular mimicry in particular cases, e.g. responsible for cross-reactivity, be considered as accidental or as a general principle in protein evolution? To answer this question, two types of similarity have to be considered: those in homologues (synonyms) and resemblance between patches from unrelated proteins (homonyms). RESULTS: All interfaces from known protein structures were collected in a comprehensive data bank [Dictionary of Interfaces in Proteins (DIP)]. A fast, sequence-independent, three-dimensional superposition procedure was developed to search automatically for geometrically similar surface areas. Surprisingly, we found a large number of structurally similar interfaces on the surface of unrelated proteins. Even patches from different types of secondary structure were found resembling each other. The putative functional meaning of homonyms is demonstrated with striking examples.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Oct
pubmed:issn
1367-4803
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
15
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
832-6
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1999
pubmed:articleTitle
Homonyms and synonyms in the Dictionary of Interfaces in Proteins (DIP).
pubmed:affiliation
Medical Faculty, Humboldt University, Charité, Institute of Biochemistry, Berlin, Germany. preissner@rz.hu-berlin.de
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study