Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
2000-3-9
pubmed:abstractText
This non-randomised concurrent cohort study conducted in two teaching hospital Departments of Surgery examined the assumption that the benefits of elective laparoscopic upper gastrointestinal surgery would apply to those with generalised peritonitis due to perforated peptic ulcers. It compared 20 consecutive laparoscopic repairs of perforated peptic ulcers with a concurrent group of 16 consecutive open repairs. There were no differences pre-operatively between the two groups. The mean duration of surgery was similar (P = 0.46). There were no differences in the rate of GI tract recovery, but opiate analgesia requirement in the laparoscopic group was significantly less (P < 0.0001). Intensive care was required in three patients in the laparoscopic group (two with renal failure) and two in the open (no renal failure). Two patients in the laparoscopic and one in the open group died. The median duration of stay was five days in the laparoscopic group and six in the open. This comparison shows that the patho-physiological insult of laparoscopy in the setting of generalised peritonitis does not obviously increase the peri-operative risk of organ failure but objective benefits are small.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/10700758-1360826, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/10700758-1448734, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/10700758-2305938, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/10700758-7059238, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/10700758-7613953, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/10700758-7648154, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/10700758-7717774, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/10700758-7796009, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/10700758-7856967, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/10700758-7974101, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/10700758-8272994, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/10700758-8472132, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/10700758-8525443, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/10700758-8526585, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/10700758-8757375, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/10700758-8846031, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/10700758-8881052, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/10700758-8939837, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/10700758-9094279
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jan
pubmed:issn
0035-8843
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
82
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
6-10
pubmed:dateRevised
2009-11-18
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2000
pubmed:articleTitle
Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcers. The role of laparoscopy in generalised peritonitis.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Surgery, Leicester Royal Infirmary, UK.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Controlled Clinical Trial