rdf:type |
|
lifeskim:mentions |
umls-concept:C0015260,
umls-concept:C0030705,
umls-concept:C0040044,
umls-concept:C0231302,
umls-concept:C0241669,
umls-concept:C0871261,
umls-concept:C1704632,
umls-concept:C1706817,
umls-concept:C1707455,
umls-concept:C1956346,
umls-concept:C2911692
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2000-3-22
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Venous occlusion (VO) and exercise stress (ES) are stimulators of the fibrinolytic system. Aim of this study was to answer which of both stimulation tests is more useful in patients with symptom-limited coronary artery disease (CAD) to evaluate possible defects in the fibrinolytic system.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal |
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Sep
|
pubmed:issn |
0340-6245
|
pubmed:author |
|
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
82 Suppl 1
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
80-4
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
|
pubmed:year |
1999
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Fibrinolytic response to venous occlusion compared to physical stress test in young patients with coronary artery disease.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Cardiology, University of Vienna, Austria.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study
|