Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/10693902
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
1
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2000-3-9
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Valuations may be sensitive to biases, especially if elicited alongside randomized clinical trials. We investigated the construction of valuations assigned by women who entered a randomized clinical trial and were allocated to in-hospital or domiciliary monitoring. Women assigned valuations (0-10 visual analogue scale) to the strategy they had been allocated to and to the alternative strategy. Valuations were expressed as a between-subject difference (assigned by the women allocated to the respective strategies) and as within-subject differences (assigned by all women). Domiciliary monitoring was valued higher by the women allocated to that strategy (P = 0.10). In-hospital monitoring was valued higher by the women allocated to that strategy (P = 0.02). The average within-subject differences differed by allocated strategy (P<0.01). The within-subject valuation differences showed large variability between and within groups. An overrepresentation of women favoring domiciliary monitoring and asymmetric treatment experience inflated the average within-subject difference in the domiciliary group but deflated that difference in the in-hospital group. Neither the average between-subject difference nor the average within-subject differences are free of bias. Other study designs probably cannot prevent bias. Comparing within-subject and between-subject differences is instructive.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Jan
|
pubmed:issn |
0895-4356
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
53
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
39-45
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2007-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:10693902-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:10693902-Bias (Epidemiology),
pubmed-meshheading:10693902-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:10693902-Fetal Monitoring,
pubmed-meshheading:10693902-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:10693902-Outcome Assessment (Health Care),
pubmed-meshheading:10693902-Pregnancy,
pubmed-meshheading:10693902-Pregnancy, High-Risk,
pubmed-meshheading:10693902-Questionnaires,
pubmed-meshheading:10693902-Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic,
pubmed-meshheading:10693902-Research Design
|
pubmed:year |
2000
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Comparing treatment valuations between and within subjects in clinical trials: does it make a difference?
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Clinical Trial,
Comparative Study,
Controlled Clinical Trial,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|