Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
2000-3-28
pubmed:abstractText
In the past 2 years, there has been some controversy about the optimal laser system, or combination of systems, for cutaneous resurfacing. Initially, it seemed that the Er:YAG laser would have significant advantages over the CO(2) laser. In practice, some of those who jumped early onto the Er:YAG bandwagon have been unimpressed with the degree of skin tightening that can be achieved with this system. Also, the excessive bleeding induced by the Er:YAG lasers prevented deeper vaporization. During the past 18 months, three new "modulated" Er:YAG lasers have been produced that are said to be able to achieve CO(2) laser-like effects, while maintaining the Er:YAG laser advantages. The purpose of this article is to examine these new systems and to discuss their potential benefits, if any, over the "conventional" Er:YAG lasers, and the CO(2) lasers.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0196-8092
pubmed:author
pubmed:copyrightInfo
Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
26
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
223-6
pubmed:dateRevised
2008-11-21
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2000
pubmed:articleTitle
Modulating the Er:YAG laser.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Dermatology, Dermatologic Surgery and Laser Center, UCSF, San Francisco, California 94115, USA.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Review