Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
4
pubmed:dateCreated
2000-4-25
pubmed:abstractText
Three split-brained subjects, one with full forebrain commissurotomy and two with callosotomy, were impaired at judging whether pairs of lights in opposite visual fields were successive or simultaneous. This impairment did not vary with luminance when the lights were grey against a dark background, but was more pronounced when the lights were equiluminant with a yellow background. All three subjects were also better able to discriminate succession from simultaneity when the lights were both in the left visual field than when they were both in the right. A fourth subject with callosal agenesis was only slightly impaired relative to normal subjects, who were virtually errorless.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0028-3932
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
38
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
441-50
pubmed:dateRevised
2011-11-17
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2000
pubmed:articleTitle
Effect of luminance on successiveness discrimination in the absence of the corpus callosum.
pubmed:affiliation
University of Verona, Human Physiology Section, Department of Neurological and Visual Science, Strada La Grazie 8, 37134, Verona, Italy. bettinaf@borgorma.univr.it
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't