Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:10622347rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1257890lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10622347lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0087111lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10622347lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0036341lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10622347lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0073393lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10622347lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205178lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10622347lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2603343lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10622347lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0103045lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:issue2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:dateCreated2000-2-8lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:abstractTextAmisulpride, a substituted benzamide with high selectivity for dopamine D3 and D2 receptors, was compared with the antipsychotic risperidone in patients with acute exacerbations of schizophrenia. The study was double-blind and involved 228 patients allocated, after a 3-6-day wash-out period, to amisulpride 800 mg (n = 115) or risperidone 8 mg (n = 113) for 8 weeks. Both treatments produced a marked improvement in schizophrenic symptomatology. Decreases in mean BPRS total score were 17.7 +/- 14.9 for amisulpride and 15.2 +/- 13.9 for risperidone, and all of the individual factors on the BPRS showed a numerically greater improvement in the amisulpride than in the risperidone patients. Both treatments were equally effective against positive symptoms on the PANSS positive syndrome subscale; however, there was a trend in favor of greater improvement in negative symptoms assessed on the PANSS negative subscale in patients receiving amisulpride with a decrease of 6.9 +/- 7.5 vs. 5.3 +/- 6.6 for risperidone (P = 0.09). Both drugs demonstrated good safety profiles, and scores on neurological scales (SAS, AIMS, and BAS) did not increase during treatment. A comparable proportion of patients received antiparkinsonian medication, 30 and 23% in the amisulpride and risperidone groups, respectively (P = 0.21). Patients receiving risperidone experienced an increase in body weight, which was significantly greater than for amisulpride (P = 0.026).lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:monthNovlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:issn0165-1781lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BeckSSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MöllerH JHJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ReidAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BaleRRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PeuskensJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FleurotOOlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:day8lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:volume88lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:pagination107-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:dateRevised2008-4-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10622347...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10622347...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10622347...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10622347...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10622347...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10622347...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10622347...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10622347...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10622347...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10622347...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10622347...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10622347...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10622347...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10622347...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10622347...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:year1999lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:articleTitleAmisulpride vs. risperidone in the treatment of acute exacerbations of schizophrenia. Amisulpride study group.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:affiliationPsychiatrisch Instituut, U.C. Sint Jozef, Kortenberg, Belgium.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10622347pubmed:publicationTypeMulticenter Studylld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:10622347lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:10622347lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:10622347lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:10622347lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:10622347lld:pubmed