Linked Life Data

10613000

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/10613000

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
5
pubmed:dateCreated
2000-1-19
pubmed:abstractText
The quality of peer reviewing in developing countries is thought to be poor. To examine whether this was so, we compared the performance of Indian and non-Indian reviewers who were sent original and review articles submitted to The National Medical Journal of India. We also tested whether informing reviewers that their comments would be exchanged improved the quality of their reviews.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0970-258X
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
12
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
210-3
pubmed:dateRevised
2009-7-30
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:articleTitle
Does exchanging comments of Indian and non-Indian reviewers improve the quality of manuscript reviews?
pubmed:affiliation
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Randomized Controlled Trial