10590728

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/10590728

Download in:

Switch to

Custom View

Named Graph Language Inference

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
Predicate	Object
rdf:type	pubmed:Citation
lifeskim:mentions	umls-concept:C0036892, umls-concept:C1533148
pubmed:issue	7
pubmed:dateCreated	1999-12-22
pubmed:abstractText	There is a strong argument in favour of sex selection, based on respect for procreative autonomy--the autonomy of couples to decide for themselves how to procreate, and what children to have. Objections based on possible harm to the child, the parents, or society, are not compelling, particularly in Australia.
pubmed:keyword	http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/keyword/Genetics and Reproduction
pubmed:language	eng
pubmed:journal	http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/journal/0400714
pubmed:citationSubset	E
pubmed:status	MEDLINE
pubmed:month	Oct
pubmed:issn	0025-729X
pubmed:author	pubmed-author:SavulescuJJ
pubmed:issnType	Print
pubmed:day	4
pubmed:volume	171
pubmed:owner	NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete	Y
pubmed:pagination	373-5
pubmed:dateRevised	2004-11-17
pubmed:meshHeading	pubmed-meshheading:10590728-Ethics, Medical, pubmed-meshheading:10590728-Female, pubmed-meshheading:10590728-Fertilization in Vitro, pubmed-meshheading:10590728-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:10590728-Male, pubmed-meshheading:10590728-Sex Preselection
pubmed:year	1999
pubmed:articleTitle	Sex selection: the case for.
pubmed:affiliation	Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC. savulesj@cryptic.rch.unimelb.edu.au
pubmed:publicationType	Journal Article