Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/10571804
Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
5
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
1999-12-10
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
The volume of urea distribution (V) is usually derived from single-pool variable volume urea kinetics. A theoretical analysis has shown that modeled single-pool V (Vsp) is overestimated when the urea reduction ratio (URR) is greater than 65 to 70% and is underestimated when the URR is less than 65%. The "true" volume derived from double-pool kinetics (Vdp) does not exhibit this effect. An equation has been derived to adjust Vsp to the expected Vdp.
|
| pubmed:language |
eng
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
| pubmed:chemical | |
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:month |
Nov
|
| pubmed:issn |
0085-2538
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:volume |
56
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
1928-33
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2004-11-17
|
| pubmed:meshHeading | |
| pubmed:year |
1999
|
| pubmed:articleTitle |
Relationship between apparent (single-pool) and true (double-pool) urea distribution volume.
|
| pubmed:affiliation |
NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. jtdaugir@uic.edu
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|